Jump to content
The King of Hate Forums


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


DanBrown0531 last won the day on May 11 2015

DanBrown0531 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

34 Excellent

1 Follower

About DanBrown0531

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

911 profile views
  1. I asked you to show me where I stated that and you're not doing that. If you think I'm going to let you say something about me, something that I never stated at all, then you're mistaken. Either point out where I stated that, or just stop responding, simple as that. I know why you can't do it, because I never stated it. The video where he threw the WiiU in the trash? I never took that video seriously because it was way over the top and filled with rage. Nobody really seriously gets so mad at a company that they'll just trash their system. It's dumb, and a waste of money.
  2. Yeah it's kind of weird seeing Capcom of all companies have a DLC model like this after their past. This will be interesting to see, and I like the idea, but it depends on the actual in-game requirements to unlock stuff. If it's completely grinding and ridiculous, then I wouldn't be too happy about that personally.
  3. Not like it's really relevant to the discussion, but I've been gaming since 1989, starting with the NES, and I've been a follower of the gaming industry ever since that day. So yeah, I'd say I'm pretty well experienced on the gaming industry, and have been for quite a while now. However since you're bringing up peoples' expertise, you don't seem to be experienced much when it comes to basic reading. Please point out in my post where I stated that multiplayer wasn't available on consoles until the mid 2000s. Never stated that, so I have no clue what thin air you pulled that out of. I can see why you would pull a stunt like that though. If I did actually say that, then yeah, I would be well off, but unfortunately I didn't make that statement. However to correct you, online multiplayer gaming was happening well before the Dreamcast debuted. If we're talking about strictly console based gaming, Sega had a online network before even the Dreamcast, but the Dreamcast made it more streamlined and easy. Unfortunately, because the Dreamcast didn't do so well, due to Segas previous bad decisions, not many people got to experience that. The first console to bring popularity to online console gaming was the original Xbox, so much so that a lot of people have the misconception that the original Xbox was the first console to have online gaming, which is wrong. - Branching out is completely fine, if you're still delivering on your core product, which Nintendo is not doing with the WiiU. People bought the WiiU to play video games on it, and have video games delivered to it, not so Nintendo can make toys and amusement parks. It upsets people and makes them think they wasted money on the WiiU, it's a shame, because the WiiU is a solid system that could've been handled a lot better. - You're aware that you can criticize a company (and even people like Phil) and still support them right? That's why it's called 'constructive criticism.' People are allowed to give out constructive criticism, whether it be critics or even fans. I've criticized Wal-Mart on some business practices they make, but I still need groceries and other products, so I shop there. I don't like some of McDonalds' business practices, but sometimes I stop in and get a sweet tea. You don't have to completely abandon a company, or be in complete lockstep support with them. Now if Phil actually came out and said that he wasn't 'supporting Nintendo anymore whatsoever,' but he was still buying their products, then that would be hypocritical. As far as I know, he's never said that, at least from what I've seen. I could be wrong as I don't watch every video, so feel free to show me if he has in fact stated that.
  4. Well that is what that person said. 'I want single player experiences,' implying that Multiplayer isn't necessary, because it's something they don't want. Actually saying that something shouldn't be implemented in a console just because they don't like it is not only childish, but selfish as well. I don't like the invasion mechanic in the Souls games, but I'm not calling for it to be removed in upcoming games, just because I don't like it. I understand that there are people that do like that. Not wanting people to have a choice is also childish and selfish. What is the benefit of Nintendo not having additional features that have been on consoles since the mid-2000s? There isn't any benefit to it, so no justification at all. Actually if I did run Nintendo, the first thing I would do is listen to what most of my consumer base wants. Pretty basic business, but Nintendo doesn't do that, as evident of the WiiUs numbers. What I would also do is supply the console with........video games. Gasp, a gaming console that actually has games coming out. It's a fascinating concept, but Nintendo doesn't seem too interested in that either, they'd rather make amiibo toys. What Nintendo needs to do is supply their consoles with enough games that fill the gap of the third party games. It won't be as many, but it's a hell of a lot better than having a 3-6 month period of no releases at all.
  5. So a console shouldn't have a certain feature just because you don't like it? No console should just cater to one mindset, it should cater to everyone. What is wrong with having choices? If you don't like multiplayer, that's fine, but there are people that do. That's why games that have both single player and multiplayer please both audiences. If you don't want your kid around that kind of community, that's fine. That's why other consoles invented stuff like the mute button, and the block button. However, none of that is being forced upon you, so why take it away from the people that do like playing online, just because you don't like it? Sorry, but that does not make sense. I don't think I've ever seen a community that actively hates having choices more than people in the Nintendo community. Mind boggling.
  6. .............We might be screwed lol........But in all seriousness, this is really cool to see.
  7. Well considering that most other companies out there would charge for the free stuff that CD Projekt Red has given away, then yeah, I would say that makes them look pretty good.
  8. No it's not, the Xbox brand is separate from PC. The only time Microsoft ever had a brand related to gaming on PC was called 'Games For Windows,' and that was also separate from Xbox. If an Xbox One game is also available on PC, it's no longer exclusive to the Xbox One, because I can buy the game on PC. I don't need to have anything Xbox related to play said game. Even if the game is developed by a studio that Microsoft owns, you still don't need to have an Xbox membership or anything related to Xbox to play said game. It's a simple fact that you can't seem to get. Saying you don't like a game, without even playing it, just because it's an indie game (which by the way, makes no logical sense) is the definition of disrespect. Of course you don't see it that way because of your mindset. Of course you still have yet to explain why you don't like Indie games, but I digress. I don't see how someone can just write off a certain selection of video games for really no logical reason. 'Filled with insults?' The closest thing that could come close to that is me using the word 'elitist,' and I only used that to describe your posts, which is not against the rules of this site. I never used any racist, sexist, or derogatory terms against you, and my posts aren't 'filled with that.' You look like the lesser person based on your own actions, by cherry picking my posts and then getting upset by attempting to abuse the reporting system. I have nothing to do with that, that's on you. Maybe if you didn't act so elitist and cherry pick posts, it probably could've been a friendly discussion, but that's not the road you took. 'Learn my lesson?' I love how you're acting like you're some backseat mod. You're the one, instead of actually discussing the topic, are trying to get rid of the discussion by falsely reporting. Nobody is forcing you to respond or even read said posts that upsets you, and that's all this is, you're just mad and upset. You can just walk away and ignore me, it's not really that hard. I don't need to report peoples' posts just because I disagree with them, I just discuss the topic. Also at the end of the day, I really don't care. You're not upsetting me by doing this. If it makes you feel better about yourself by reporting posts just because you're upset at the topic, then go ahead. Once again, it just displays your character, not mine. My point though was that, is it really necessary to compare the Xbox One to the PS4 when talking about how great the Xbox One is? That's what you did in your original post, was constantly compare it to the PS4, and talking about how the PS4 fails in certain areas when compared to the Xbox One. It gives off that 'PS vs Xbox' vibe. Actually you can use different controllers for different consoles. I believe they make adapters for that. I've actually seen someone use a 360 controller on a PS3.
  9. Okay I'm not sure what the picture is supposed to mean. Even so, even if that person is incorrect, how does that discredit the entire company and all of the good things they've done for gamers? It doesn't. Where did they say they wanted to be the 'next Bethesda?' I've never heard them say that, but their actions speak otherwise. Last time I checked, Bethesda doesn't constantly give out free content and weekly updates to their games.
  10. It might be, not sure, but they did do a physical release for it on the Wii. It also came with a Super Mario history booklet which was pretty cool. Gave you some really cool insight on the history of Mario.
  11. Yes the detractors definitely are doing just that, no question, however Phil is still wrong here, for accusing Joe of being 'paid off' for a review. Anyone who has watched Joe for any length of time would know that Joe would do nothing like that. He's constantly railed against the major companies out there, the ones that would try to pay off people. Also, to accuse CD Projekt Red of all developers out there to throw money around to get good review scores is completely nuts. CD Projekt Red is one of the most honest developers that are out there right now. They've constantly given away free content for the Witcher games for years now. They even came out and discussed about how when Microsoft was getting exclusive physical content for the collectors edition, they came out and were honest about it, saying they did it so that their game could get more exposure with the gaming audience. How many developers would actually take the time to address something like that? Not many. I can see why Phil would think that, based on how he scores games, he probably might think that a 10/10 for any game must be a paid off review, but to still accuse Joe of that without any proof is totally wrong, especially when Joe has stated countless times, even in the Witcher 3 review, that 10/10 doesn't mean that it's a perfect game.
  12. - Mario Kart Wii - Zelda Twilight Princess - Zelda Skyward Sword (only if you're a hardcore Zelda fan) - Super Mario All-Stars (if you can find it, might be hard to find) - Donkey Kong Country Returns - New Super Mario Bros Wii - Super Mario Galaxy 1 + 2 That's all I can of for now
  13. Here is your quote, once again: Also you do realize that Xbox is a PC thing too right? Just because its not exclusive to the One doesnt mean its not exclusive to Xbox. 'Xbox is a PC thing' No it's not, Xbox is a gaming console, and a PC is not. This was in response to me saying that Xbox One games that are on PC are no longer exclusive to Xbox One, so yeah, you did say that. All you said was that PS4 will 'eventually get better games later on', which is funny because before that, you stated that you don't judge a game unless you look into it yourself, so you're going against your own process there. Also, saying that a console has had no great games on it for almost two years is pretty negative. Just saying. If you made a game, and then I said that your game was 'nothing special' without even playing it, just because it's an indie game, you wouldn't feel insulted? Most, if not all, people would, and it's completely disrespectful. You got mad at Phil because he was being disrespectful to Tim Schafer, yet your quote was disrespectful to not only Tim, but to every single indie developer that's in the industry. Also, I asked you what was so wrong about Indie games, yet you dodged that, which I'm not surprised about, because there is no valid answer. An indie game is no different from a AAA game, they're all video games. Yes it is elitist, because you're acting like indie games are 'beneath' other video games, which is asinine. Actually what you did was take two sentences out of my quote, and tried to make me look like I meant something I never did mean. You cherry picked those two sentences that were about two different topics at hand. It's a common tactic used a lot by people who can't retort with a valid counterpoint, happens a lot in politics. You cherry picking them is not a BS excuse, because that is exactly what you did. It's all in black and white there. Also, the 'final time.' I somehow doubt that, considering that you were supposed to be 'done' several posts ago. Reporting....That's hilarious, considering I didn't break any rules, but that pretty much proves my point. When someone gets upset and gets their points completely torn apart, they have to resort to things like reporting. You pretty much made my point there by doing that. Also, I really don't care if you did or not, it only shows your character, not mine. It's funny how you expect me to respect you and take you seriously when you resort to a tactic like cherry picking my statements and then reporting my posts. Respect is earned, not deserved. That's something you need to remember. The only one that seems to have an attitude problem here would be you I'm afraid. You're entitled to your own opinions of a systems game line up, and your own view of the system itself. However when you are factually wrong about something, then you will be called out about it. Xbox One and WiiU definitely deserve more credit than they get, however I do find it funny how most people who usually say that can't seem to praise the Xbox One without trying to discredit the PS4. Honestly I would think if the Xbox One was as good as people say it is, they would be able to list reasons why it's a great system without trying to compare it to the PS4, and bring down the PS4.
  14. Hmm I thought you were done. Guess you couldn't help yourself. Trust me, I'm not surprised at all. Of course there are games that are published by Microsoft that are on PC. However, you stated that ALL games that are on the Xbox One, but also are on PC, are still considered exclusive to Xbox. Once again, that is false. Not lying, just using your own quotes. Here it is: Also you do realize that Xbox is a PC thing too right? Just because its not exclusive to the One doesnt mean its not exclusive to Xbox. Trust me, an Xbox is NOT the same thing as a PC. Actually I said that 'I'm smarter than you in this discussion,' never stated that I was smarter than in you in general, but I can understand how upset you would be. Usually when someone like you gets their points completely debunked, they tend to get upset. You are an elitist by quotes such as this: What good exclusives does PS4 have. Everything is just "Okay" except for Bloodborne? And indies arent anything special. But Xbox on the other hand has amazing exclusives like Forza Horizon 2 and Project Spark. So lets see here, completely dismissing almost all of PS4s games, and then saying that Indie games 'aren't anything special,' completely trashing hard working developers in this industry.............yep, that would make you an elitist I'm afraid, not to mention a lot of your other comments that I've seen. Also I've not dodged anything, and you can't point out anything, that's why you haven't. I've answered every single point that was either asked of me, or presented to me. All because you constantly repeat it over and over, it doesn't make it true. If I truly hated the Xbox One, I wouldn't be praising it, or even own one. Hell I haven't even trashed it one time in this discussion, just stating the facts on why the PS4 has been more successful. That doesn't automatically mean I hate the console, or Microsoft. Of course once again, when someone such as yourself really doesn't have any points to add, they have to pull things out of the sky. That's why you have to assume things, because you have no facts to back up your statements. Why would I accept your points? Your points are ignorant and based on falsehoods. I don't accept stuff that isn't true. Then again, I don't see you accepting anything that is positive for PS4. I don't expect you to, but I can easily flip that around toward you. It's your opinion that the PS4 is not a quality product, however, by saying that the PS4 only sold because of hype and no other reasons, is not your opinion, that is a false statement, as I've already proven multiple times. Even bullet pointed the reasons as to why the PS4 ended up being more successful. It would help to actually read the posts, but I digress, that might be too much for you. How is it rude to not like indies? What is wrong with them? They are video games just like any other game released on a console or PC. Why do you see them as beneath your level? See, that's the key there, you're an elitist, and that's the type of mindset you have. Not only that, it's disrespectful to gaming developers that work hard on these games, but then you have the nerve to whine that Phil is being disrespectful to Tim Schafer, while you're being disrespectful to all indie developers (which includes Tim Schafer). That would make you a hypocrite, among all of the aforementioned stuff. If I were to make the statement that 'Xbox exclusives aren't anything special,' would you consider that rude? If you do, that also makes you a hypocrite. Trust me, I don't have to do anything. Your posts alone only continuously discredit any validity you may, or may not, have had. That's why this is amusing, when a fanboy elitist such as yourself gets worked up over this. Then again, you were supposed to be 'done.'
  15. The reasoning for Joes' score of Arkham Knight was because he played the PC version, and the PC version had a ton of issues that ended up hindering his experience. I enjoy both of yours' guys reviews. I watch reviews to listen to people talk about the game, and both you and Joe do a good job actually going in depth with the games.
  • Create New...