Jump to content
The King of Hate Forums

Random Thoughts 4.0


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Darksphere92

    5736

  • KGhaleon

    5052

  • sateler96

    3057

  • MDCFAN101

    2700

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

​First troll account, not even mad.

The sad part about this post is that people like you actually believe it. You've deluded yourself into thinking that's how my mind works. Maybe when I first started on YouTube and didn't "get it," but

Posted Images

48 minutes ago, KGhaleon said:

I tried to download the MH Rise demo, but the eshop is getting slammed right now.

i got the 3rd Party Joycons so far theyre pretty nice and the grip/handle they gave you seems professionally made.

my case i ordered will be here tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So moderation stuff...I've been thinking about it and I may give trolls a chance, instead of outright banning people for acting like idiots. Everybody acts like an idiot sometimes.

So if someone is breaking the rules and acting like an ass, they'll get suspended for a week. If it happens again, two weeks. If it happens after that they'll either get suspended for a month or just banned entirely.

If I give someone multiple chances and they still don't get it, then it's their own fault.

I recently banned Higgs for acting like a dumbass, so I'm changing his ban to a week suspension. If he comes back and starts acting up again then he can just be banned again. This seems pretty fair IMO.

Of course people posting porn, ad spam or other severe rule breaking will still get permanent bans if they went too far.

:edit:

There, Higgs can post again starting next thursday if he wants to. Recent troll bans changed to a week.

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, KGhaleon said:

So moderation stuff...I've been thinking about it and I may give trolls a chance, instead of outright banning people for acting like idiots. Everybody acts like an idiot sometimes.

So if someone is breaking the rules and acting like an ass, they'll get suspended for a week. If it happens again, two weeks. If it happens after that they'll either get suspended for a month or just banned entirely.

Will you let people discuss & post information about something, regardless if it's talked about in Kiwifarms or not, since facts are independent of the poster that made it? You know, like when I posted something available to you and others.

Also, I don't agree with the new rule you added because it doesn't make sense and severely goes against the freedom of the members. That's because in this case the "source" is public, (Kiwifarmers just happen to post it, you can take them out of the equation), and logical conclusions can be made after reviewing what was presented. This is not malicious & covering one's ears is not a solution.

Like I've said, information is impartial.

Edited by MoraMoria
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MoraMoria said:

Will you let people discuss & post information about something, regardless if it's talked about in Kiwifarms or not, since facts are independent of the poster that made it? You know, like when I posted something available to you and others.

Also, I don't agree with the new rule you added because it doesn't make sense and severely goes against the freedom of the members. That's because in this case the "source" is public, (Kiwifarmers just post it), and logical conclusions can be made after reviewing what was presented. This is not malicious & covering one's ears is not a solution.

Like I've said, information is impartial.

The rule is that it's getting nuked if the information is just being propagated from Kiwi or other DSP detractor group. It's the source of the story that's important.

If it came from a DSP video or something, fine. I have nothing against original discussions.

Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, KGhaleon said:

It's the source of the story that's important.

If it came from a DSP video or something, fine. I have nothing against original discussions.

lmao

3 hours ago, MoraMoria said:

I like this guy's skits. He tries to highlight some of the stereotypes in anime series.

 

Caleb's really good. You should check old school RDCworld too.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Beautifulbutterfly said:

 

 

Screenshot_20210109-010504_Chrome.jpg

He's wrong though, people have every right to be angry. Twitter also banned our President for no reason.

This would be like if some DSP fans went out and killed some people, and twitter banned DSP from their platform in response even though he didn't tell them to do it.

The New Zealand shooter told people to subscribe to PewDiePie right before shooting up a bunch of people, yet I don't see Pewdie being banned for that.

People just taking the piss out of Trump for something he wasn't involved with.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, KGhaleon said:

He's wrong though, people have every right to be angry. Twitter also banned our President for no reason.

This would be like if some DSP fans went out and killed some people, and twitter banned DSP from their platformer in response even though he didn't tell them to do it.

I was wondering what everyone thoughts were about what was going on with twitter. After reading his first sentence I was so confused, He uses Twitter alot so I assumed he would miss twitter if it shut down. Anyway Your example is spot on Trump shouldn't have even been banned from Twitter if he didn't break any rules.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, KGhaleon said:

The rule is that it's getting nuked if the information is just being propagated from Kiwi or other DSP detractor group. It's the source of the story that's important.

If it came from a DSP video or something, fine. I have nothing against original discussions.

Listen, I'm not trying to go against you just for the sake of it, but you're not understanding something, allow me to explain:

The information that is being discussed here is not propagated solely from Kiwifarms, they just happen to post it, but they're not the source. As an example, the LINE thing: they're not the source, LINE-App is. Just because they post it, doesn't mean it's unreliable, it does not come from them, just like if they quote a public document. They're discussing information whose origin is disconnected from them.

If you look at data objectively, you shouldn't make either ad-hominems or appeal to authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MoraMoria said:

Listen, I'm not trying to go against you just for the sake of it, but you're not understanding something, allow me to explain:

The information that is being discussed here is not propagated solely from Kiwifarms, they just happen to post it, but they're not the source. As an example, the LINE thing: they're not the source, LINE-App is. Just because they post it, doesn't mean it's unreliable, it does not come from them, just like if they quote a public document. They're discussing information whose origin is disconnected from them.

If you look at data objectively, you shouldn't make either ad-hominems or appeal to authority.

So kiwifarms just post information about phil from sources like the Line app?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MoraMoria said:

Listen, I'm not trying to go against you just for the sake of it, but you're not understanding something, allow me to explain:

It's pretty simple actually. If I see people talking about some kind of DSP drama like "DSP divorced! DSP is being hunted by the mafia! DSP has a second wife!" etc and I go over to Kiwi and see some 50+ post about it, then the subject is gone because you're clearly bringing a discussion from there onto this forum.

It's extremely insignificant.

Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, KGhaleon said:

It's pretty simple actually.

I think the last line in my previous comment speaks for itself, but again, I'm not trying to give you a headache. So have a good night.

17 minutes ago, planettenon4 said:

Exactly. But still....

Don't worry, I'm not bringing that stuff again to discuss here unless it's allowed and there's a reason to, but I'll at least explain myself.

35 minutes ago, Beautifulbutterfly said:

So kiwifarms just post information about phil from sources like the Line app?

No, Kiwifarms has a large sub-forum on Phil with thousands of pages on him, with a lot of different people, just like in any relatively popular Social Media site. This usually means that you'll get different perspectives: some people might hate him to the point of submitting false data, (willingly or not); others might be interested on actual facts as a priority over their dislike of him; and then all of those in between.

In regards to the LINE-App, I explained it previously, but my post was deleted, so I'll not make it again unless KGhaleon decides to let it stay. What was in that post had public information accessible to anyone willing to look it up for themselves, just like what was posted in Kiwifarms, as far as I've seen.

It's not like they have privileged information, (rarely in cases they do, it's because of other factors I'll skip here for brevity), but in regards to this entire topic that is apparently banned in TKOH, all/most information has a reference in some way or another. And like I've said somewhere before, I carefully reviewed my claims in the thread I made where Phil responded, which is the reason you don't hear me talking about the "Chat-Mod Images/Leaks", because that's unverifiable to everyone except the one who leaked it.

That is an example of something that should be left out, (even with a moderator implying that they're real, (because there's also a problem with that)), however the other stuff, (like LINE), is right there. Impartial information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

having a discussion about a topic if everyone is being grown up and civil should be allowed right? isn't that what a forum is all about,,,just because people on kiwi farms happen to be discussing the same thing is irrelevant to what people over here think. secondly having what is and what isn't off limits for discussion dictated by what detractors are talking about just means they control phils own forums without even trying to...its a mistake 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Messed around with the MH Rise demo this weekend and it's pretty fun, the new wire mechanic is weird so it's gonna take a while to get good at using it. Demo had a good 5 or so monsters in it.

The rideable dogs are awesome though, you can freaking drift around corners.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This one is also funny.

 

1 hour ago, tezboi said:

having a discussion about a topic if everyone is being grown up and civil should be allowed right? isn't that what a forum is all about,,,just because people on kiwi farms happen to be discussing the same thing is irrelevant to what people over here think. secondly having what is and what isn't off limits for discussion dictated by what detractors are talking about just means they control phils own forums without even trying to...its a mistake 

That's why I think the rules have a major problem, now more than ever.

In my opinion, anyways.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, MoraMoria said:

This one is also funny.

 

I don't think I've ever had restaurant folks confuse straws for sauce before.

Usually they just get the entire meal I ordered confused for another.

 

Been going back and rewatching King of the hill lately, this show is way funnier than it used to be.

Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, KGhaleon said:

Usually they just get the entire meal I ordered confused for another.

Wow, that's something.

I usually don't like to go to restaurants/drive-throughs, so nothing crazy has happened to me yet.


This video is about interviews to people with really bad super-powers, it's great.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...